CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 76% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 76% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
A major Vietnamese clean-up. Has the government restored confidence in the debt market?

Vietnam's debt market faced a severe systemic crisis (2022-2024) due to government regulations curbing property speculation and corruption, causing a liquidity crunch and real estate slowdown. The question remains whether new laws and reforms are genuine structural improvements for a resilient financial future or merely cosmetic.
In an attempt to curb corruption and speculative frenzy in the property market, the government in Hanoi tightened the regulatory noose (Decrees 153/2020/ND-CP and 65/2022/ND-CP) so tightly that it stifled the entire corporate bond market. Liquidity evaporated overnight. Developers who had been aggressively rolling over debt hit a wall.
The trillion-dong question is: is this just window dressing, or is it a genuine structural reform on which to build the next cycle?
The Anatomy of the Crisis
To understand where we are, we must remember how we got here. The crisis had two pillars:
Liquidity Crisis in bonds: Companies such as Novaland (NVL) and Hung Thinh became synonymous with the problem. Their business model was based on constant access to new debt. When the market froze, they were unable to repay maturing bonds or finance their current operations. The confidence of retail investors – who bought these bonds as ‘safe investments’ – was destroyed.
Structural crisis in real estate sector: At the same time, the real estate market came to a standstill. Transactions fell by 60-80%. The problem was deeper than just liquidity - it concerned a lack of transparency, complicated land ownership laws and speculative price inflation.
The government realised it had gone too far. The response was twofold:
Macro-firefighting: The State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) cut interest rates, and the government issued Decree 08 (March 2023), which was a de facto admission of error. It allowed developers to renegotiate the terms of their bonds and, crucially, to repay their debts in the form of assets (e.g. flats). This was a classic case of kicking the can down the road, buying time.
Building foundations: This is the most important part. In 2024 and 2025, the government pushed through the ‘big three’ new laws: the amended Land Law, the Real Estate Market Activity Law and the Housing Law. Most came into force in August 2024, with some elements joining in January 2025.
These are not minor changes. The new Land Law revolutionises the way land is valued, making it more market-oriented and transparent. This strikes at the very root of corruption. The new regulations also make it easier for Viet Kieu (Vietnamese expatriates) and foreigners to purchase property, opening up the market to new capital.
What does the chart say?
Financial markets are machines that discount the future. If fundamentals are improving, charts should be the first to show it. Let's take a look at Vietnam's VNREAL real estate stock index.

The chart is clear:
Collapse (Q4 2022 - Q1 2023): Throughout 2022, we see a systematic decline. From its peak to its low in 2023, the index lost over 58%. It was panic and forced (margin call) selling.
Base (2023 - 2024): The last two years have been a painful, broad consolidation under crucial moving averages. The chart resembles a patient in intensive care whose vital signs are stabilising.
Revival & Key Levels: The entire market is now watching the January 2022 ceiling levels that has nowadays become a support. A sustained hold above these levels (holding above ~ 2100 level) next month would be a technical signal that large capital (both local and foreign) actually believes in a recovery. Trading volume on these shares remains high, but is more accumulative than panicky in nature.
Who will survive the ‘Great Clean-up’?
Are these reforms restoring confidence? The answer is yes, but only selectively.
The market has stopped treating all developers equally. The ‘Great Clean-up’ separates the wheat from the chaff. The Vietnamese government has done a titanic, albeit belated, job. The new land and housing laws are a fundamental game-changer for the next decade. The market is healthier, more transparent and less prone to speculative bubbles.
However, in the short term, liquidity remains low. Banks are still afraid to lend to developers. Foreign investors are returning, but instead of buying bonds ‘blindly’, they are now carefully analysing balance sheets. This is no longer a market for the naive. The crisis has enforced discipline - and that is the greatest success of the ‘Great Clean-up’.
Share

Michal Kochanowski
Specializing in on-chain data analysis and market trends, with a background in decentralized finance (DeFi) research and development.