Bitcoin and the Nasdaq-100 have often moved in the same direction as investors respond to changes in liquidity, interest-rate expectations and broader risk appetite. However, their relationship is not always consistent. Recent market movements in November 2026 have highlighted this distinction, as Bitcoin struggled to recover while US technology stocks rebounded from a sharp sell-off.
A similar divergence appeared in May and June, when Bitcoin weakened considerably despite the Nasdaq-100 maintaining relative strength. Comparing these two episodes offers insight into how market correlations can change and why traders may need to look beyond broader equity market movements when assessing Bitcoin.
May 2026: Bitcoin Weakened While Technology Stocks Held Their Ground
The first notable divergence emerged between May and June 2026.
- After recovering strongly in April and early May, Bitcoin began losing momentum. Its decline accelerated through June, with its relative performance falling into negative territory on the comparison chart.
- Meanwhile, the Nasdaq-100 maintained positive performance, trading considerably above its starting level.
This difference suggested that Bitcoin and technology stocks were responding to different market drivers.
- Technology equities retained support from expectations surrounding artificial intelligence (AI), corporate investment and earnings growth.
- Bitcoin appeared more exposed to factors specific to the cryptocurrency market. These may have included changes in institutional demand, liquidity conditions, derivatives positioning and broader crypto market sentiment.
The divergence illustrated an important characteristic of financial markets: assets that share similar risk characteristics do not necessarily respond to the same catalysts at the same time.
Figure 1: BTC and Nasdaq-100 Futures
November 2026: A Different Market Shock, but a Similar Divergence
A second divergence developed in November, although the initial market conditions were different.
- On November 5, US equities experienced a significant sell-off, led by technology and semiconductor stocks. The Nasdaq-100 Futures declined 6.35%. The sell-off reflected investor concerns about potential policy changes following the US midterm elections, the expansion of data centers and whether substantial AI infrastructure investments would generate sufficient returns.
- Bitcoin also came under pressure during the sell-off, falling below $76,000. At the same time, according to Coindesk, US spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) recorded approximately $430.2 million in net outflows, while approximately $1 billion in leveraged cryptocurrency positions were liquidated over a 24-hour period.
However, the subsequent recovery revealed a different pattern. On November 9, Nasdaq-100 Futures gained 3.43%, while Bitcoin futures declined by 1.26%. Bitcoin, meanwhile, struggled to regain its previous momentum.
By November 11, the Nasdaq-100 Futures had recovered more convincingly from its recent decline, while Bitcoin continued to face selling pressure. This divergence highlighted a difference in performance between the two markets, despite their historically close relationship.
Why Can Bitcoin and Nasdaq Move Differently?
Several factors may explain why the relationship between Bitcoin and technology stocks changes over time.
1. Different sources of investment demand
Technology stocks represent ownership in businesses with identifiable revenue streams, earnings expectations and capital investment plans. Bitcoin, by contrast, does not generate corporate earnings or cash flows.
Consequently, investors may evaluate the two asset classes using different considerations. Changes in corporate earnings expectations could support technology stocks without necessarily improving demand for Bitcoin.
2. Cryptocurrency-specific market conditions
Bitcoin can be influenced by factors that have limited direct impact on traditional equity markets.
These include spot ETF flows, derivatives positioning, exchange liquidity, regulatory developments and cryptocurrency market sentiment.
For example, significant leveraged liquidations may intensify downward price movements even when broader financial markets begin to stabilize.
3. Changing liquidity and risk appetite
Both Bitcoin and technology stocks may benefit from favourable liquidity conditions. However, their sensitivity to interest rates, funding conditions and investor positioning can differ.
During periods of market stress, investors may reduce exposure to multiple risk-sensitive assets simultaneously. Yet, when conditions improve, capital may return to equities more quickly than to cryptocurrencies.
This could help explain why Bitcoin does not always participate in broader equity market recoveries.
What Does This Mean for Bitcoin-Nasdaq Correlation?
One important lesson from these two episodes is that correlation should not be treated as a permanent relationship.
A 30-day rolling correlation between Bitcoin and the Nasdaq-100 Futures in 2026 reportedly fell to approximately -0.71 on 15 September 2026, before rising to around +0.9 in October and November.
Figure 2: 30-Day Rolling Correlation Between BTC and Nasdaq-100 Futures
These figures suggest that the relationship between the two assets changed considerably over the period.
However, correlation measures how closely two assets' daily returns move together over a specified period. It does not establish that one asset causes movements in the other, nor does it guarantee that their prices will continue moving in the same direction.
A short-term divergence can emerge even when the broader correlation remains positive.
For traders, this distinction is particularly important when evaluating Bitcoin alongside technology indices.
Key Lessons for Traders
The changing relationship between Bitcoin and the Nasdaq-100 offers several considerations for market analysis:
- Monitor relative strength: Comparing percentage performance can help identify whether Bitcoin is outperforming or underperforming technology stocks, even when both remain above their initial reference levels.
- Reassess historical correlations: Relationships observed during one market phase may weaken or strengthen under different liquidity and risk conditions.
- Watch asset-specific catalysts: Bitcoin ETF flows, derivatives positioning and cryptocurrency market developments may provide additional context beyond traditional equity market indicators.
- Avoid treating divergence as an automatic trading signal: A temporary difference in performance does not necessarily indicate an imminent reversal or continuation of the existing trend.
Combining relative performance with rolling correlation, market structure and broader macroeconomic conditions may provide a more comprehensive view of changing market dynamics.
Conclusion
The divergences observed in May–June and November 2026 highlight the evolving relationship between Bitcoin and technology stocks.
While both markets may respond to broader changes in liquidity and risk appetite, their individual drivers can produce different price reactions. Bitcoin's weaker recovery relative to the Nasdaq-100 in November also suggests that improvements in equity market sentiment do not necessarily translate into an immediate recovery across cryptocurrency markets.
Risk Disclaimer: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 76% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. This marketing publication is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not an investment recommendation. We do not suggest any investment strategy in this material, nor do we provide investment advice. The material does not take into account your individual financial situation, needs, or investment objectives. It does not constitute a solicitation or invitation to buy, sell, or engage with any product or service of IUX. We have prepared this marketing publication carefully and objectively. We present the facts known to the authors at the time of its creation. We do not include any judgmental elements. Information and research based on historical data or results, as well as forecasts, are not a reliable indicator of the future. We are not responsible for your actions or omissions, especially if you decide to purchase or sell financial instruments based on the information in this marketing publication. We are also not liable for any damages that may result from the direct or indirect use of this information. Investing is risky. Invest responsibly.
Source: Coindesk
